Thursday, April 26, 2012
Friday, April 20, 2012
A Quixotic Quest to Mine Asteroids
A Quixotic Quest to Mine Asteroids
Wall Street Journal, 20 April 2012
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303513404577356190967904210.html
Wall Street Journal, 20 April 2012
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303513404577356190967904210.html
A new company backed by two Google Inc. billionaires, film director James Cameron and other space exploration proponents is aiming high in the hunt for natural resources—with mining asteroids the possible target.
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Draft Nano-Satellite Launch Challenge Rules Available
Draft Nano-Satellite Launch Challenge Rules
SpaceFlorida, 19 April 2012
PDF: http://www.spaceflorida.gov/docs/misc/draft-nanosat_launcher_challenge_rules.pdf
Main Page: http://www.spaceflorida.gov/nano-sat-launch-challenge
The Nano-Satellite Launch Challenge will result in a maximum total amount of NASA awards of $3,000,000 (three million U.S. dollars) paid directly by NASA to the eligible winner(s) of the Challenge. SFSSRC may attract additional prize funding from other sources, subject to NASA’s prior concurrence. SFSSRC is receiving no funding from NASA to perform its management responsibilities of this Challenge.
SpaceFlorida, 19 April 2012
PDF: http://www.spaceflorida.gov/docs/misc/draft-nanosat_launcher_challenge_rules.pdf
Main Page: http://www.spaceflorida.gov/nano-sat-launch-challenge
The Nano-Satellite Launch Challenge will result in a maximum total amount of NASA awards of $3,000,000 (three million U.S. dollars) paid directly by NASA to the eligible winner(s) of the Challenge. SFSSRC may attract additional prize funding from other sources, subject to NASA’s prior concurrence. SFSSRC is receiving no funding from NASA to perform its management responsibilities of this Challenge.
A Greener Alternative to Hydrazine
A Greener Alternative to Hydrazine
SpaceRef, 19 April 2012
http://spaceref.com/event/28th-national-space-symposium/a-greener-alternative-to-hydrazine.html
Hydrazine, a mainstay fuel of the space program since the early days, now has a competitor that is easier to store and - when taking all costs into account - is the same price.
A subsidiary of the Swedish Space Corp., called ECAPS, has been developing a High Performance Green Propulsion (HPGP) fuel that is based on ammonium dinitrimide.
SpaceRef, 19 April 2012
http://spaceref.com/event/28th-national-space-symposium/a-greener-alternative-to-hydrazine.html
Hydrazine, a mainstay fuel of the space program since the early days, now has a competitor that is easier to store and - when taking all costs into account - is the same price.
A subsidiary of the Swedish Space Corp., called ECAPS, has been developing a High Performance Green Propulsion (HPGP) fuel that is based on ammonium dinitrimide.
Friday, April 13, 2012
Mars Viking Robots 'Found Life'
Mars Viking Robots 'Found Life'
Discover, 12 April 2012
http://news.discovery.com/space/mars-life-viking-landers-discovery-120412.html#mkcpgn=rssnws1
New analysis of 36-year-old data, resuscitated from printouts, shows NASA found life on Mars, an international team of mathematicians and scientists conclude in a paper published this week.
Further, NASA doesn't need a human expedition to Mars to nail down the claim, neuropharmacologist and biologist Joseph Miller, with the University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, told Discovery News.
"The ultimate proof is to take a video of a Martian bacteria. They should send a microscope -- watch the bacteria move," Miller said.
"On the basis of what we've done so far, I'd say I'm 99 percent sure there's life there," he added.
Discover, 12 April 2012
http://news.discovery.com/space/mars-life-viking-landers-discovery-120412.html#mkcpgn=rssnws1
New analysis of 36-year-old data, resuscitated from printouts, shows NASA found life on Mars, an international team of mathematicians and scientists conclude in a paper published this week.
Further, NASA doesn't need a human expedition to Mars to nail down the claim, neuropharmacologist and biologist Joseph Miller, with the University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, told Discovery News.
"The ultimate proof is to take a video of a Martian bacteria. They should send a microscope -- watch the bacteria move," Miller said.
"On the basis of what we've done so far, I'd say I'm 99 percent sure there's life there," he added.
Thursday, April 5, 2012
Loophole Could Allow Private Land Claims on Other Worlds
Loophole Could Allow Private Land Claims on Other Worlds
Wired, 5 April 2012
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/04/moon-mars-property/
But Simberg argues that the treaty doesn’t explicitly prevent private companies from claiming territory. Though, if the U.S. government accepted such a claim, that could be taken as a declaration of sovereignty, which might violate the Outer Space Treaty, said space law attorney Michael Listner.
Wired, 5 April 2012
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/04/moon-mars-property/
But Simberg argues that the treaty doesn’t explicitly prevent private companies from claiming territory. Though, if the U.S. government accepted such a claim, that could be taken as a declaration of sovereignty, which might violate the Outer Space Treaty, said space law attorney Michael Listner.
Sunday, April 1, 2012
Why Are LAUNCH COSTS So High?
Why Are LAUNCH COSTS So High?
Peter A. Taylor, 2004
http://home.earthlink.net/~peter.a.taylor/launch.htm
Why do space launches cost so much? Specifically, why are the costs so far out of line with the cost of seemingly comparable airplane operations? Fuel is about 15% of the operations and maintenance (O&M) cost of a typical military airplane, and 38% for commercial aircraft, according to Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, 1992, by Daniel P. Raymer. Space launches should be more energy intensive than airplane flights, so one would expect that propellants would be a larger fraction of the total operations cost for a launch industry that was as mature as the airline industry. Why are the non-fuel costs orders of magnitude higher for rockets?
Peter A. Taylor, 2004
http://home.earthlink.net/~peter.a.taylor/launch.htm
Why do space launches cost so much? Specifically, why are the costs so far out of line with the cost of seemingly comparable airplane operations? Fuel is about 15% of the operations and maintenance (O&M) cost of a typical military airplane, and 38% for commercial aircraft, according to Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, 1992, by Daniel P. Raymer. Space launches should be more energy intensive than airplane flights, so one would expect that propellants would be a larger fraction of the total operations cost for a launch industry that was as mature as the airline industry. Why are the non-fuel costs orders of magnitude higher for rockets?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)